MN-Sen: Recount Regression, Day 14

For a more complete explanation of the process used, please refer to my initial post on the subject.

Recap of today's official result:

            Recount         Original
Coleman:   1,174,964   -   1,177,465  =  -2,501
Franken:   1,186,134   -   1,188,736  =  -2,602

Franken Net Today:  -13 (41 Yesterday, -29 day before, -100)
Total Franken Net: -101
Franken Deficit:    316

The following two graphs depict the number of votes gained or lost with respect to the total votes recorded for each precinct that has completed their recount. Each dot represents the change between the originally certified result and the post recount tally in a given precinct with x number of total votes:

MN Senate Recount Regression

And the current functions used in conjunction with the regression:

MN Senate Recount Regression Functions Not Found

Now again using those functions, the following two graphs further illustrate the regression interpolation. The graph below illustrates the regression when applied to precincts of all sizes; Wright County, the largest county finished recounting. The dotted lines represent the two-day-ago regression, while the dashed lines represent yesterday's. The thin lines depict the linear regression while the thicker curvy lines present a quartic regression. The black bars emanating from the x axis represent the number of precincts, statewide with x number of total votes. There are a few straggler precincts between 2600 and 6621 that are not depicted due to the resolution of the graph.

MN Senate Recount Regression

Using the previous two graphs, and the functions they represent, a projection can be made for the cases covered. For each precinct, the total vote total is taken and applied to the listed function for each candidate. The result is then added to that candidate's sum, and the next precinct is calculated. This process is done using precinct results from the final certification. Performing the calculation across all precincts yields the following result:

            Franken:  -2634 (+/- 152)
            Coleman:  -2535 (+/- 144)

            Net Franken:  -98 (+/- 296)

Franken still appears to trail by 98 votes but these projections have a large window of certainty. If the extreme is taken, by taking -98 and adding 296 votes, Franken still falls short of the pre-recount deficient of 215.

The graph below shows the number of challenges by each candidate relative to how they are performing in a given precinct. The dots represent challenges; a dot to the north of the x-axis represents a precinct that the candidate is currently winning. A dot to the south shows the number of challenges in a precinct that each candidate is currently losing. There are no negative challenges.

MN Senate Recount Regression

The next graph shows each candidate's challenge regression on the same graph:

MN Senate Recount Regression

It appears that a larger percent of Franken challenges occur in precincts he is currently winning, relative to Coleman's percentage. They both appear to be challenging more ballots in precincts they are winning, but Franken at a higher rate. This discrepancy may allow Franken to make up additional votes, but an exact number is impossible to predict.

This analysis is valid as of right now (3:06 AM CT 12/4), after 97.58% of all votes have been recounted. Recounting should continue, uninterrupted through Friday.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Ma.gnolia
  • StumbleUpon
Your Ad Here

0 Response(s) to MN-Sen: Recount Regression, Day 14

Leave a Reply:

Name: (Defaults to Anonymous)
Type the characters you see in the image below:
(Word Verification)
Electoral College Projection Map
Senate Projection Map