# Dissonance Amongst the Delegates

CBS News and the New York Times just conducted a poll among Democratic Delegates asking the VP question. The results, Clinton received 28 (271.6 votes) percent of the vote, while Biden, the next closest responded, received 6 percent. There was however an enormous percentage of participates who were undecided, 36 percent and another 9 percent selected other. I was initially skeptical of this poll's result until I analyzed the statistics present in the sample. The sample included 970 randomly selected delegates, 23.8% of the 4081 total delegates.

Before I detail my analysis I want to first establish the basic variables used in my calculation. Lets first state that as of June 3rd (the night Obama sealed the nomination) Obama had 2172 delegates (53.2%) and Clinton had 1909 (46.8%) delegates; I draw these figures from our Democratic Delegate Estimates page that was maintained throughout the primaries. The delegate poll was conducted to include both pledged delegates and super delegates but of course CBS and the NY Times did not provide the raw numbers, so I'm left with the task of trying to figure it out. Luckily though, the poll provided additional information in the secondary question; Would Clinton as VP help Obama win the election? The matrix below uses these numbers to calculate the percentage of delegates questioned from each delegate group, Obama allocated, Clinton allocated and unpledged.

Within the text of the published poll result it states that 61% of Clinton allocated pledged (Thanks John) delegates supported her as their preferred VP choice, while just 3% of Obama's delegates supported Clinton as their first choice. If we assume that the sample is perfect, each side's percentage in the sample space is the same as their percentage of pledged delegates, then Obama would have 419.99 pledged representatives and Clinton would have 384.57. Using these figures and the percentages noted in the report an estimate to the theoretical support for Clinton as a VP can be determined; 61% * 384.57 = 234.59 for Clinton delegates, 3% * 419.99 = 12.60 for Obama delegates and 20% * 165.43 = 33.09 among the super delegates for a total of 280.278 or 28.90% if the sample were perfect. The 28.90% doesn't line up with the 28% as noted in the final poll result but its very close; Clinton and Obama delegates are over represented in the poll sample while the super delegates are under represented.

Now here comes the problem with this poll. If 410.31 Clinton delegates were interviewed and 61% of pledged delegates favored Clinton as their preferred VP choice, who did the other 39% prefer? The most likely response would be undecided, then other but this conclusion provides nothing of value. In fact its a guarantee that 14% of Clinton delegates choose undecided or other, but its also possible that all 39% voted undecided or other; absolutely inconclusive. The result of the poll essentially says this, "A majority of Clinton supporters think Obama should choose Clinton as the VP. The other half, well we have no idea what they think, it could be anybody because we didn't provide enough data." But this non-result is fascinating in itself. If 39% of Clinton delegates, who are by definition her hardcore supporters, have moved away from blindly supporting Clinton then the rest of the 18 million people who voted for her likely have as well. That's not to say that they are fully supportive, but at least they've taken off their tinfoil hats. The poll also squelches any possibility of a surprise Clinton nomination when the vote is called because much of her original support has boarded the Obama train.

Published on August 19th at 12:20 AM CT :: 1 Comment

# Hillary's Popular Vote Miscalculation

With news of Hillary's upcoming concession, or something equivalent, I thought I would attempt to dispel her continuing belief that she has won the popular vote. To start off, I'll illustrate the metric she is using and then move into a more thorough calculation. To begin, the table below shows the vote totals for each primary. Each race links to a government or party affiliated election results page that depicts the numbers used in this analysis. There are four races (American Somoa, Kansas, Virgin Islands, Hawaii) in which I could not find a government or party reported page detailing vote totals. For these states I cross checked results on numerous media sites to verify accuracy.

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type New Hampshire 104815 112404 285040 -7589 Jan-8 Primary Michigan 0 328309 328309 -328309 Jan-15 Primary South Carolina 294898 140990 532151 153908 Jan-26 Primary Florida 576214 870986 1749920 -294772 Jan-29 Primary Alabama 300321 223096 536635 77225 Feb-5 Primary Alaska 6674 2194 8880 4480 Feb-5 Primary Arizona 193126 229501 456626 -36375 Feb-5 Primary Arkansas 82476 220136 314234 -137660 Feb-5 Primary California 2093318 2524799 4882620 -431481 Feb-5 Primary Connecticut 179742 165426 355561 14316 Feb-5 Primary Delaware 50467 39984 96374 10483 Feb-5 Primary Georgia 704247 330026 1060851 374221 Feb-5 Primary Illinois 1318234 667930 2038614 650304 Feb-5 Primary Massachusetts 511680 705185 1263764 -193505 Feb-5 Primary Missouri 406917 395185 825050 11732 Feb-5 Primary New Jersey 501372 613500 1141199 -112128 Feb-5 Primary New Mexico 71396 73105 149779 -1709 Feb-5 Primary New York 751019 1068496 1862445 -317477 Feb-5 Primary Oklahoma 130130 228480 414696 -98350 Feb-5 Primary Tennessee 252874 336245 624764 -83371 Feb-5 Primary Utah 74538 51333 428459 23205 Feb-5 Primary Louisiana 220632 136925 384346 83707 Feb-9 Primary DC 93386 29470 123994 63916 Feb-12 Primary Maryland 532665 314211 878174 218454 Feb-12 Primary Virginia 627820 349766 986203 278054 Feb-12 Primary Wisconsin 646851 453954 1113753 192897 Feb-19 Primary Ohio 982489 1212362 2233156 -229873 Mar-4 Primary Rhode Island 75316 108949 186439 -33633 Mar-4 Primary Texas 1362476 1462734 2874986 -100258 Mar-4 Primary Vermont 91901 59806 154960 32095 Mar-4 Primary Mississippi 265502 159221 434110 106281 Mar-11 Primary Pennsylvania 1046822 1260937 2307759 -214115 Apr-22 Primary Indiana 632035 646233 1278268 -14198 May-6 Primary North Carolina 887391 657669 1580726 229722 May-6 Primary West Virginia 91663 239187 357031 -147524 May-13 Primary Kentucky 209903 459210 700855 -249307 May-20 Primary Oregon 372823 258438 636680 114385 May-20 Primary Puerto Rico 121458 263120 387299 -141662 Jun-1 Primary Montana 102544 75053 181906 27491 Jun-3 Primary South Dakota 43576 54015 97591 -10439 Jun-3 Primary Hillary's Calculation 17011711 17528570 36254207 -516859 + Uncommited MI for Obama 17249879 17528570 36492375 -278691

Totaling these numbers we are left with what the Clinton campaign is calling a decisive victory despite excluding 16 contests. Also notice that the 'uncommitted' votes from Michigan are not included in Obama's column. The Clinton campaign does not associate the 238,168 votes as Obama's because he electively chose to have his name removed from the ballot. At this juncture Clinton has a clear advantage but if I take into consideration the decision of the Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC) pertaining to delegate allocation and apply it to raw votes a different result arises. Following their recommendation necessitates halving the votes of Florida and Michigan requiring a recalculation of primary contests.

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type 1/2 Votes Michigan 0 164154.5 164154.5 -164154.5 Jan-15 Primary 1/2 Votes Florida 288107 435493 874960 -147386 Jan-29 Primary RBC Total 16723604 16928922.5 35348137 38612.5

Simply stunning; it appears that using the determination of the RBC gives Barack Obama the popular vote lead among primaries. As a sneak peak I'll just tell you that he accrues a significant lead in the "less important caucuses" ensuring a popular vote victory. At this point I'll digress and move onto the caucus numbers to see if Obama can dent Clinton's rather impressive lead using the full votes from Michigan and Florida.

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type American Somoa 121 163 285 -42 Feb-5 Caucus Colorado 80113 38839 120971 41274 Feb-5 Caucus Idaho 16880 3655 21224 13225 Feb-5 Caucus Kansas 27172 9462 36723 17710 Feb-5 Caucus Minnesota 142109 68994 214066 73115 Feb-5 Caucus North Dakota 11625 6948 19012 4677 Feb-5 Caucus Abroad 15214 7501 23105 7713 Feb-5 Other Nebraska 46279 43614 93757 2665 Feb-9 Caucus Virgin Islands 1772 149 1970 1623 Feb-9 Other Hawaii 28347 8835 37562 19512 Feb-19 Caucus Wyoming 5378 3311 8753 2067 Mar-8 Caucus Guam 2264 2257 4521 7 May-3 Caucus Caucus Total 377274 193728 581949 183546

The caucus results clearly show that Obama excelled in this style of election winning all contests but American Somoa in which only 285 people voted. If we add the result of these caucuses to the primary results we get the values shown below.

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type Hillary's + Caucuses 17388985 17722298 36836156 -333313 + Uncommited MI for Obama 17627153 17722298 37074324 -95145

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type Iowa 187096 163709 526209 23387 Jan-3 Caucus Nevada 163709 128629 292338 35081 Jan-19 Caucus Washington 619757 292338 912095 327419 Feb-9 Caucus Maine 175403 105242 280645 70161 Feb-10 Caucus Estimates 1145966 689918 2011287 456048

Obama makes up 450,000 votes in these four elections. Adding these totals to the previous totals we arrive at our results.

 Race Obama Votes Clinton Votes Total Votes Difference (BHO-HRC) Election Date Election Type Total + Estimates 18534951 18412216 38847443 122735 + Uncommited MI for Obama 18773119 18412216 39085611 360903

The final results show that no matter how Michigan and Florida are counted, just as long as all other contests are counted Obama wins the popular vote. If at this point Clinton still wants to dispute the estimates for the four remaining caucuses she only has razor thin margins to fall back on and any additional estimates will likely reveal identical conclusions; for example RealClearPolitics.com conducted a similar analysis and the final results were comparable.

Published on June 5th at 3:40 AM CT :: 0 Comments

# Indiana Antics

Before the two most recent polls were released in Indiana (Downs Center [4/16], LA Times/Bloomberg [4/14]) Clinton had a comfortable lead of 9.25 percent, on average. A significant shift occurred with the release of these two new polls each showing Obama positioned with a 5 percent advantage; a swing of nearly 15 percent in the span of just a week. How did Hillary manage to squander 15 percent in this crucial state? To answer this question the actions of each candidate during the previous week must be analyzed. In the prior week Barack Obama continued his campaign in Pennsylvania and at one point referred to voters as "bitter" in the face of economic hardship. He also stated that these same "bitter" voters have given up on voting for real issues but rather focus their attention on "guns and religion." At the same time Hillary Clinton toured Indiana seeking to appeal to whiskey drinkers and firearm fanatics while touting herself as the "in touch" candidate countering what the media described as Barack's "bitter" blunder. But the poll numbers don't lie and clearly illustrate that Clinton's rhetoric completely failed.

But perhaps Obama's rise in poll numbers can be attributed to something entirely different. Perhaps people actually do feel "bitter" when they lose their job for bureaucratic reasons. Perhaps his poll numbers increased among those who are in fact "bitter". Perhaps Clinton is out of touch with the real issues. Perhaps she realizes she cannot win on the issues and is instead seeking to appeal to the same demographic for which she derided Obama for referencing; the "guns and religion" vote. Perhaps all of these ifs are true, does Obama then have the nomination wrapped up? The polls appear to be paving the way in either case.

The Indiana primary takes place on May 6th, the same day as North Carolina and fourteen days after Pennsylvania. Indiana has 72 national pledged delegates.

Published on April 18th at 7:08 PM CT :: 0 Comments